The issues of biodiversity are greatly related to the threats of cultural diversity. Biodiversity goes hand in hand with specific ecosystems and those who live there, while cultural diversity is peoples’ different cultural aspects in certain areas/populations. Biodiversity includes the cultural diversity in a country — the people of the country and their traditions, way of life, morals, religion, etc. Since there are countless cultures as well as differentiating environments, I believe there are certainly damages that can be seen both to biodiversity and cultural diversity.
Yes, I believe governing bodies should be actively involved through legislation and funding in order to protect cultural diversity; although, there is a fine line between protecting it, and controlling it. The government has a huge impact on its country and with their help, diversity can be protected and continue on. The government has the power to advocate for certain issues that have an impact on their country, cultures, and biodiversity. For example, in Thailand the continuous loss of biodiversity at such an alarming rate is due to lack of social awareness. If the government was to advocate for the issues of biodiversity, it would make the people of Thailand more aware, creating a chance to protect the biodiversity. Cultural diversity is what sets us apart as humans — it is what makes us different, yet what can connect us. Without the protection of cultural diversity, our world would no longer be polychromatic. It would be boring, and everyone would be the same. The government can help protect cultural diversity just as it can protect biodiversity. For example, in Australia they have set up programs that teach cultural acceptance, and also given each culture their own rights on how they want to express their culture. Wade Davis from the Ted Talk video states that with the protection of cultural diversity, we do not have to fear living in a monochromatic world that lacks diversity. I agree with Wade Davis — I believe our world should be polychromatic instead of monochromatic. I believe the government can make a huge impact on protecting cultural diversity through legislation and funding. Although, there is always a possibility of the lack of funding, which may disable the government from taking action to try and protect the cultural diversity in their country. In my opinion, the government should not act alone in protecting the countries cultural diversity. The people of the different cultures should advocate for their needs and develop programs that can help ensure the protection of their culture — hopefully leading to the protection of all the cultures of the country. Yes, the government is the ‘big man’ in the scenario who can get things done easier and faster; but individual people must also stand up for themselves and what they believe in.
2 Comments
4/12/2016 08:44:03 pm
I thought your response on the importance of cultural diversity and biodiversity was very interesting. You made a great point about cultural differences being what set us apart from others. I also agree with you on this point and think we need to maintain our differences in order to become a better world.
Reply
Sonia Cortez
4/12/2016 11:21:15 pm
I have to say that I agree with most of what you said throughout your post. I also believe that biodiversity and cultural diversity go hand in hand and one without the other isn't the same. In order to have cultural diversity, I believe that we have to protect the biodiversity within our country, it is part of what makes us unique. I also think that the government should be more involved in protecting endangered species and environments. Raising awareness to the issue is also a way to get everyone involved. Like you said, the government is the "big man" but any individual contribution to the situation can go a long way,
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKristin Wenzel Archives
April 2016
Categories |